To all the self righteous 'Americans' out there screaming to send the illegals home, let us remember that the Pilgrims didn't check in at Customs either when the landed. It wasn't like the land was uninhabited. We always need to look first at history so we know whether we are being reasonable or selfish.
America is a big country.
American's, in general, seem to have small minds.
In reality we are all illegal immigrants. I know my great grandparents slipped the border to come here for work. To raise a family. My great grandfather married a local girl and died in a construction accident. And no one cared except for his wife, because he was just another Irishman. Another illegal who would work where decent folk wouldn't.
Not a lot different from today. Illegals aren't taking good jobs, because they can't get hired with no papers. They aren't getting welfare, because they don't dare raise their heads that high for fear of being sent home. They work for a living and pay taxes they can't file for refunds on and Social Security they can't ever receive, and pay for Medicaid they can't ever get.
Sure we need better immigration laws. Why are they coming across illegally? Decent hardworking families? Are our rules too restrictive? Is the system working against them? Fix the process and the rules that cause them to be illegals FIRST. Then talk repatriation or amnesty.
Don't get the cart before the horse, or you'll end up pulling the cart. .
Wednesday, May 11, 2011
Wednesday, February 09, 2011
Thomas Jefferson, Mao Zedong, and Ed Osborne walk into a bar...
And the first question that comes to mind is "Who's Ed Osborne?"
He's my father, and possibly one of the most opinionated people I ever met. During the 60's (about my earliest recollection) and the '70s he was virulently outspoken against communism in all it's forms from Maoist China (he had a copy of Mao' s Little Red Book hid up on his shelf next to his bible because he believed in knowing his enemy) to social reform in this country (like welfare and civil rights).
Mao, as we all know, was the Chinese leader that is responsible for creating modern China out of the ashes of World War II, and making it a 'Workers Paradise' or the last hold out as a 'Communist' country. The reason Mao supported Communism is because the Russians (but not the American's or English) supported his People's Army that drove the Japanese out of China.
Thomas Jefferson, as we all know, articulated a particular view of social political structure where the people have the greatest right to command the government. He also advocated violent revolution against the established authorities.
What do these men have in common? They all advocated violent change as a medium of controlling social policy.
I'm sure I don't have the thorough knowledge of Mao's policies or Jefferson's writings that I need to really pull off this thesis but it seems to me that my father's ideas for social change/control in this country were more in line with the authoritarian actions of the People's Leader (Mao) than the writings of the aristocratic Jefferson.
In many ways this contrast is between the semi anarchy that is the United States with our gun rights and murders, and vigilantes and freedom of speech and freedom of assembly and the mild to strict authoritarian systems in place in other countries where the people either revolt against the government in total anarchy or run from the government in fear for their lives.
Here we can't run from our government because we are the government. Take a look around. You and your neighbors elect the hell hounds in Washington and Albany. Don't like what they're doing? Recall them. Elect someone else. Run yourself. Sure its a tough fight but it needs to be fought. Just don't sell your soul to the company store.
He's my father, and possibly one of the most opinionated people I ever met. During the 60's (about my earliest recollection) and the '70s he was virulently outspoken against communism in all it's forms from Maoist China (he had a copy of Mao' s Little Red Book hid up on his shelf next to his bible because he believed in knowing his enemy) to social reform in this country (like welfare and civil rights).
Mao, as we all know, was the Chinese leader that is responsible for creating modern China out of the ashes of World War II, and making it a 'Workers Paradise' or the last hold out as a 'Communist' country. The reason Mao supported Communism is because the Russians (but not the American's or English) supported his People's Army that drove the Japanese out of China.
Thomas Jefferson, as we all know, articulated a particular view of social political structure where the people have the greatest right to command the government. He also advocated violent revolution against the established authorities.
What do these men have in common? They all advocated violent change as a medium of controlling social policy.
I'm sure I don't have the thorough knowledge of Mao's policies or Jefferson's writings that I need to really pull off this thesis but it seems to me that my father's ideas for social change/control in this country were more in line with the authoritarian actions of the People's Leader (Mao) than the writings of the aristocratic Jefferson.
In many ways this contrast is between the semi anarchy that is the United States with our gun rights and murders, and vigilantes and freedom of speech and freedom of assembly and the mild to strict authoritarian systems in place in other countries where the people either revolt against the government in total anarchy or run from the government in fear for their lives.
Here we can't run from our government because we are the government. Take a look around. You and your neighbors elect the hell hounds in Washington and Albany. Don't like what they're doing? Recall them. Elect someone else. Run yourself. Sure its a tough fight but it needs to be fought. Just don't sell your soul to the company store.
Wednesday, November 03, 2010
Welcome Tea Party Activists
Dear America.
You F^&*ing Morons.
Oh I should scratch that but I can't find it in my heart to say something soothing and peaceful.
A bunch of rapid dogs have been elected to office. In the grand scheme of things I agree with them. The way we do business has to be changed. But the idea that the republican party (the corporate party) has won after two years of trying to screw up the good things and blaming Obama for the policies they instituted. The propaganda machine has over come the truth and common sense. Now the dogs are going to rip up things they don't understand.
Like health care. None of these illiterate bastards have read the bill. The worst parts are sops to the republicans and maybe should be repealed. But the idea that we the people should insure ourselves is good business. Yeah, let's redo health care right. Let's make sure everyone gets healthcare and the insurance companies are out of that business. They don't need any more unearned money.
Let's use that extra money to fund small business green projects that cuts the knees out of the corporate meglomaniacs. Let small business guide the development of our new economy without the weight of healtinsurance payments. Each Health insurance company collects at least 35% of their premiums as profit. Don't pay them and there is a net savings.
But do you think those tea party morons would see the positives in this? I don't think so because they are paid to support the Corporate Megolith. Big Money and Big Business has bought and paid for this election and their rapid dogs are going to chew at the little progress towards rationality we have made. I say the whole economic crisis was engineered by big business and big money to break the Obama administration and the democratic movement.
Looks like the money won as usual.
You F^&*ing Morons.
Oh I should scratch that but I can't find it in my heart to say something soothing and peaceful.
A bunch of rapid dogs have been elected to office. In the grand scheme of things I agree with them. The way we do business has to be changed. But the idea that the republican party (the corporate party) has won after two years of trying to screw up the good things and blaming Obama for the policies they instituted. The propaganda machine has over come the truth and common sense. Now the dogs are going to rip up things they don't understand.
Like health care. None of these illiterate bastards have read the bill. The worst parts are sops to the republicans and maybe should be repealed. But the idea that we the people should insure ourselves is good business. Yeah, let's redo health care right. Let's make sure everyone gets healthcare and the insurance companies are out of that business. They don't need any more unearned money.
Let's use that extra money to fund small business green projects that cuts the knees out of the corporate meglomaniacs. Let small business guide the development of our new economy without the weight of healtinsurance payments. Each Health insurance company collects at least 35% of their premiums as profit. Don't pay them and there is a net savings.
But do you think those tea party morons would see the positives in this? I don't think so because they are paid to support the Corporate Megolith. Big Money and Big Business has bought and paid for this election and their rapid dogs are going to chew at the little progress towards rationality we have made. I say the whole economic crisis was engineered by big business and big money to break the Obama administration and the democratic movement.
Looks like the money won as usual.
Thursday, September 02, 2010
Burn Down Their House
I've got a favorite phrase I use when it comes to the people I feel are responsible for the economic predicament America is in at the moment. Burn their house down. Except I don't mean in the literal sense of mindless ultra violence and anarchy but rather in the political sense. There are some very wealthy people who have used their wealth to manipulate the political system to support their agendas.
This is not a early 21st century conspiracy theory, this was true when Hearst ordered his newspapers to support certain candidates and policies, and it's true today when FOX entertainment pretends to be a 'news' channel when it is really providing propaganda that spreads fear and discontent in the middle class.
I deduce from their focus of fear that the people who control FOX are afraid of a unified and thoughtful middle class who would have the power to burn their political house down.
Let's face it. The average entrepreneur and small businessman doesn't run in the same circles as the Forbes 400 wealthiest Billionaires. Your local savings and loan chairman didn't make $4 BILLION on the economic fire sale that happened when the housing market burst.
But the political manipulators would like these people to join the panic over the president's attempts to clamp down on the people and companies that have manipulated our economy into despair. Who sold our manufacturing to the Chinese? Who profits from the Chinese? Walmart and the Walton family as one example.
I say, follow the money. Who is profiting from the economic stagnation and despair? Once we kn ow, burn their F(&*ing house down. Metaphorically speaking.
This is not a early 21st century conspiracy theory, this was true when Hearst ordered his newspapers to support certain candidates and policies, and it's true today when FOX entertainment pretends to be a 'news' channel when it is really providing propaganda that spreads fear and discontent in the middle class.
I deduce from their focus of fear that the people who control FOX are afraid of a unified and thoughtful middle class who would have the power to burn their political house down.
Let's face it. The average entrepreneur and small businessman doesn't run in the same circles as the Forbes 400 wealthiest Billionaires. Your local savings and loan chairman didn't make $4 BILLION on the economic fire sale that happened when the housing market burst.
But the political manipulators would like these people to join the panic over the president's attempts to clamp down on the people and companies that have manipulated our economy into despair. Who sold our manufacturing to the Chinese? Who profits from the Chinese? Walmart and the Walton family as one example.
I say, follow the money. Who is profiting from the economic stagnation and despair? Once we kn ow, burn their F(&*ing house down. Metaphorically speaking.
Saturday, June 26, 2010
Vegans, Mylie Cyrus and British Petroleum
The chatter on Facebook this afternoon was about Mylie Cyrus and sex. Specifically using an underage girl as a sex object to market her brand. Of course this is as cynical as it is effective. The human beast is wired to respond to the high hormone level in the young females of the species. They become sexually attractive by virtue of their body chemistry, and in turn enjoy the attention they get by being available to males. In previous generations mothers actively discouraged their daughters from advertising their availability by controlling their clothing choices. Now we find the clothing choices are marketed as 'empowering' even in prepubescent children.
Empowering means flaunting this basic sexual reaction between males and females in females that are not ready emotionally or intellectually to make choices that protect them from the cynically predatory male sexual response.
Who benefits from this empowerment? Not the little girls who are targets for every sexually frustrated male in their vicinity, including adults who should know better. Not the sexually frustrated male, especially at his 18+ yr peak. A three year delta at eighteen is a jail term but at 21 it's getting lucky.
So the majority of marketing is targeted at people with the highest hormone levels, the least maturity and the most sensitive egos. And the corporate marketing executives use sex to increase their sales, and incidentally driving the cultural norms implying that the rules don't apply to the observer.
And the corporations will tell you that they are just reflecting societal norms, not making the norms. Which is a lot like how BP is addressing the Gulf Coast. One lady (a clean up team leader) was fired for telling her team to excavate for sludge buried by the tidal sands. She was told the job was just cosmetic.
I heard in the Crystal Restaurant in downtown Watertown NY that BP is leasing the charter boats that have been losing business due to the oil spill. Are they using these vessels to mitigate the oil problem? Of course. They want to prevent the news media from discovering the true extent of the disaster they (BP) created.
Of course with BP the truth is this is just business. They want to control the perceptions of how bad the problem is. It's all about marketing the brand. They can't be the green energy brand name when they've caused one of the biggest ecological disasters since the Exxon Valdeez. (Exxon has never lived that down and it's no where near as bad as the BP Deepwater fiasco.
So what's this got to do with Mylie Cyrus and Vegans?
Corporate greed uses human nature, whether sex, or security or greed, to meet its objectives. The vegans unfortunately, are trying to do something lofty by not eating animals under the presumption that will prevent the death of the animal. However since the majority of food animals are raised specifically for diner their lives will not be spared if we skip a hamburger. Should we as a race cease eating meat the animals would have to be disposed of just so their waste wouldn't continue to damage the ozone layer.
We shouldn't let corporate greed dictate our morals. In fact we should insist that corporations behave in a moral manner. After centuries of using oppressive control techniques to protect our daughters a free society can't abide lies, chastity belts and the law treating females as property. But we need to be open about human nature and what the unpleasant truths are about human sexuality as well as the more pleasant aspects. A blunt and open discussion with our youth would be more effective than all the platitudes and fear campaigns and jean advertisements.
We can't change human nature but we can understand it, accept it and work with to build a better society.
Empowering means flaunting this basic sexual reaction between males and females in females that are not ready emotionally or intellectually to make choices that protect them from the cynically predatory male sexual response.
Who benefits from this empowerment? Not the little girls who are targets for every sexually frustrated male in their vicinity, including adults who should know better. Not the sexually frustrated male, especially at his 18+ yr peak. A three year delta at eighteen is a jail term but at 21 it's getting lucky.
So the majority of marketing is targeted at people with the highest hormone levels, the least maturity and the most sensitive egos. And the corporate marketing executives use sex to increase their sales, and incidentally driving the cultural norms implying that the rules don't apply to the observer.
And the corporations will tell you that they are just reflecting societal norms, not making the norms. Which is a lot like how BP is addressing the Gulf Coast. One lady (a clean up team leader) was fired for telling her team to excavate for sludge buried by the tidal sands. She was told the job was just cosmetic.
I heard in the Crystal Restaurant in downtown Watertown NY that BP is leasing the charter boats that have been losing business due to the oil spill. Are they using these vessels to mitigate the oil problem? Of course. They want to prevent the news media from discovering the true extent of the disaster they (BP) created.
Of course with BP the truth is this is just business. They want to control the perceptions of how bad the problem is. It's all about marketing the brand. They can't be the green energy brand name when they've caused one of the biggest ecological disasters since the Exxon Valdeez. (Exxon has never lived that down and it's no where near as bad as the BP Deepwater fiasco.
So what's this got to do with Mylie Cyrus and Vegans?
Corporate greed uses human nature, whether sex, or security or greed, to meet its objectives. The vegans unfortunately, are trying to do something lofty by not eating animals under the presumption that will prevent the death of the animal. However since the majority of food animals are raised specifically for diner their lives will not be spared if we skip a hamburger. Should we as a race cease eating meat the animals would have to be disposed of just so their waste wouldn't continue to damage the ozone layer.
We shouldn't let corporate greed dictate our morals. In fact we should insist that corporations behave in a moral manner. After centuries of using oppressive control techniques to protect our daughters a free society can't abide lies, chastity belts and the law treating females as property. But we need to be open about human nature and what the unpleasant truths are about human sexuality as well as the more pleasant aspects. A blunt and open discussion with our youth would be more effective than all the platitudes and fear campaigns and jean advertisements.
We can't change human nature but we can understand it, accept it and work with to build a better society.
Friday, June 11, 2010
No Fear
The catch phrase titling this post is a fallacy. Fear is the cornerstone of our ability to learn, whether used by our parents as in fear of physical or emotional punishment, or by the law (remember breaking any law has a punishment, and punishment is to be feared) or political activity.
Control comes from directing fear.
Power comes from Control.
If you want to know who's in power look at who's directing your fear.
I spoke with a friend yesterday who strongly believes that the Constitution has been usurped in Washington. He believes that the real power in this country lies with the Haliburton's and the Merril Lynch's.
I think he might be right to a certain degree. Corporate media and corporate sponsored sponsored media is responsible for dumbing down the discourse in America to fear bites. What should we fear today? They tell us, and then tell us we have to act on this fear.... Everything from the complexity of our cable bills (a corporate deception used to raise profits) to our president (take any sound bite from Fox News).
Fear leads to panic and panic thinking is usually reactive and predictable. Any soldier will tell you that to panic the enemy is to win the battle. Lesson here? The fear and panic mongers think of the people as the enemy.
I want us, the people of this country to exercise control. I'm afraid of the corporate power because it is insidious and above the reach of the law. At least it appears that way. I don't want to be afraid of these non persons. I would like to tear down the facade that hides the men and women behind the curtain. Managers of corporations should be personally liable. Corporations should not be protected. They are not people. They have no rights. Especially not the right to make a profit.
I think that we can change the climate of fear by stripping Corporate America of its unnatural rights. And if the multinational corporations don't want to play here then I think we need to go back to self sufficiency.
Control comes from directing fear.
Power comes from Control.
If you want to know who's in power look at who's directing your fear.
I spoke with a friend yesterday who strongly believes that the Constitution has been usurped in Washington. He believes that the real power in this country lies with the Haliburton's and the Merril Lynch's.
I think he might be right to a certain degree. Corporate media and corporate sponsored sponsored media is responsible for dumbing down the discourse in America to fear bites. What should we fear today? They tell us, and then tell us we have to act on this fear.... Everything from the complexity of our cable bills (a corporate deception used to raise profits) to our president (take any sound bite from Fox News).
Fear leads to panic and panic thinking is usually reactive and predictable. Any soldier will tell you that to panic the enemy is to win the battle. Lesson here? The fear and panic mongers think of the people as the enemy.
I want us, the people of this country to exercise control. I'm afraid of the corporate power because it is insidious and above the reach of the law. At least it appears that way. I don't want to be afraid of these non persons. I would like to tear down the facade that hides the men and women behind the curtain. Managers of corporations should be personally liable. Corporations should not be protected. They are not people. They have no rights. Especially not the right to make a profit.
I think that we can change the climate of fear by stripping Corporate America of its unnatural rights. And if the multinational corporations don't want to play here then I think we need to go back to self sufficiency.
Thursday, June 10, 2010
Corporate Innovation
One of the Facebook characters stated that Corporations are the source of all innovation and job creation.
After I finished choking I tried to explain succinctly and politely that corporations are responsible for stifling innovation and shipping jobs over seas where they don't have to pay workers a living wage.
The sad part was the joker attacked the president and then declined further discussion under the label of inappropriate venue.
Well this is an appropriate venue and I offer up my thoughts with the understanding anyone may respond as long as they are polite. Facts will be checked and bullshit called.
My particular point is that corporations were created to hide owners and concentrate wealth. They were not created, nor do they, innovate or create jobs. Most corporations consolidate actual production jobs (production as opposed to overhead or non-production labor) to minimize their direct costs. Overhead can be amortized over quantity but direct costs accrue proportionately with production, because they add value (ie create wealth).
Here are real facts on innovation.
Nikola Tesla, an immigrant from Serbia, invented the modern electrical distribution system, fluorescent lights and radio. These are true facts. Look up the patents. He was paid 25,000 by Westinghouse for the patents on the generators, transformers, switches, and distribution system he designed and then he built the first generation plant at Niagara Falls.
George Westinghouse provided cash. And made BILLIONS. Without Nikola Tesla's genius we'd have no power grid, no aluminum manufacturing operations, no airlines, spaceflight, and pretty much anything that requires large quantities of electrical energy. (Semi conductors....) And we might have more air pollution because of inefficient coal usage.
One example.
PCs are another. IBM had no interest in small computers until Apple founders Jobs and Wozniak started selling computers to persons. Then they decided to peddle to their corporate market. IBM and Microsoft, as corporate partners, stifled the growth of the personal computer for years. Windows was/is a poor copy of Apple's OS. Innovation stifled. Oh and Apple as a corporation doesn't want anyone to play with their toys... another stifler.
So where are the examples of corporate innovation? Well when I worked for Scott Fetzer in the early 80's we manufactured electric motors in Watertown NY. The workers in the factory were mostly women (because they worked for less) and the management wanted to cut direct costs so they opened a plant in Mexico where instead of $8 an hour they paid the workers $8 a day. Instead of using high end manufacturing techniques and training the workforce to operate robotic equipment they just found people they could hire for less money to do things the old way.
Innovation.
Those are the facts. Corporations don't want to create wealth for individuals. They want to create wealth for themselves, with no moral compunctions otherwise. Corporations need to be regulated and tightly controlled because they have no human values. They only consider profit and that doesn't support human society. We saw how they manipulated the economy when no one was watching them. They bled the economy until it nearly collapsed.
I could go on but I really am tired. It would be nice if we the people, conservative and otherwise, could have a civilized and intelligent discussion. We might find that the real villains are the ones trying to tell us what a good job they're doing fixing the mess they made.
After I finished choking I tried to explain succinctly and politely that corporations are responsible for stifling innovation and shipping jobs over seas where they don't have to pay workers a living wage.
The sad part was the joker attacked the president and then declined further discussion under the label of inappropriate venue.
Well this is an appropriate venue and I offer up my thoughts with the understanding anyone may respond as long as they are polite. Facts will be checked and bullshit called.
My particular point is that corporations were created to hide owners and concentrate wealth. They were not created, nor do they, innovate or create jobs. Most corporations consolidate actual production jobs (production as opposed to overhead or non-production labor) to minimize their direct costs. Overhead can be amortized over quantity but direct costs accrue proportionately with production, because they add value (ie create wealth).
Here are real facts on innovation.
Nikola Tesla, an immigrant from Serbia, invented the modern electrical distribution system, fluorescent lights and radio. These are true facts. Look up the patents. He was paid 25,000 by Westinghouse for the patents on the generators, transformers, switches, and distribution system he designed and then he built the first generation plant at Niagara Falls.
George Westinghouse provided cash. And made BILLIONS. Without Nikola Tesla's genius we'd have no power grid, no aluminum manufacturing operations, no airlines, spaceflight, and pretty much anything that requires large quantities of electrical energy. (Semi conductors....) And we might have more air pollution because of inefficient coal usage.
One example.
PCs are another. IBM had no interest in small computers until Apple founders Jobs and Wozniak started selling computers to persons. Then they decided to peddle to their corporate market. IBM and Microsoft, as corporate partners, stifled the growth of the personal computer for years. Windows was/is a poor copy of Apple's OS. Innovation stifled. Oh and Apple as a corporation doesn't want anyone to play with their toys... another stifler.
So where are the examples of corporate innovation? Well when I worked for Scott Fetzer in the early 80's we manufactured electric motors in Watertown NY. The workers in the factory were mostly women (because they worked for less) and the management wanted to cut direct costs so they opened a plant in Mexico where instead of $8 an hour they paid the workers $8 a day. Instead of using high end manufacturing techniques and training the workforce to operate robotic equipment they just found people they could hire for less money to do things the old way.
Innovation.
Those are the facts. Corporations don't want to create wealth for individuals. They want to create wealth for themselves, with no moral compunctions otherwise. Corporations need to be regulated and tightly controlled because they have no human values. They only consider profit and that doesn't support human society. We saw how they manipulated the economy when no one was watching them. They bled the economy until it nearly collapsed.
I could go on but I really am tired. It would be nice if we the people, conservative and otherwise, could have a civilized and intelligent discussion. We might find that the real villains are the ones trying to tell us what a good job they're doing fixing the mess they made.
Wednesday, May 19, 2010
An Anonymous Response
I'm always over joyed when someone reads and comments on my thoughts. But being the madman that I am I have to respond, especially when I don't think my point came across the first time (based on the comment under greedism which I'll the reader peruse at their pleasure).
Here is my response to my reader:
Dear Anonymous...
The point behind the title of the post (Greedism) is that buzzwords don't describe what's going on.
Capitalism is a useful technique, if used morally, to nurture and develop a technically advanced economy.
Capitolism (ed. note spelling from comment), which could be defined as a mindless allegiance to dogma spouted by neo_fascists has used to justify laws violating the constitution, and the very nature of our freedoms. Need to be careful there.
What we need isn't more laws, but more morality. BP acted immorally endangering their employees as well as the ecosystem of the Gulf despite direct and correct advisement by technical experts. Their management should be put on a Texas chain gang and left to clean up the coast by hand, the assets of the company sold off to offset the costs of closing the well and the whole business of risky oil wells considered too dangerous to pursue.
We'd get as far with Wave generators and hydrogen manufacturing plants. But that's the subject of another rant.
The purpose of this rebuttal is to question the gut reaction (make laws) and suggest alternative actions (dismantle the company and punish the guilty).
Just some thoughts.
Here is my response to my reader:
Dear Anonymous...
The point behind the title of the post (Greedism) is that buzzwords don't describe what's going on.
Capitalism is a useful technique, if used morally, to nurture and develop a technically advanced economy.
Capitolism (ed. note spelling from comment), which could be defined as a mindless allegiance to dogma spouted by neo_fascists has used to justify laws violating the constitution, and the very nature of our freedoms. Need to be careful there.
What we need isn't more laws, but more morality. BP acted immorally endangering their employees as well as the ecosystem of the Gulf despite direct and correct advisement by technical experts. Their management should be put on a Texas chain gang and left to clean up the coast by hand, the assets of the company sold off to offset the costs of closing the well and the whole business of risky oil wells considered too dangerous to pursue.
We'd get as far with Wave generators and hydrogen manufacturing plants. But that's the subject of another rant.
The purpose of this rebuttal is to question the gut reaction (make laws) and suggest alternative actions (dismantle the company and punish the guilty).
Just some thoughts.
Monday, May 17, 2010
Greedism
Mankind creates society to support greed.
There I said it. We want to believe in human kindness and the basic Godness in all of us but that's crap. Society is/was and apparently always will be a support structure for greedy self serving bastards.
Capitalism is an economic philosophy that says it takes money to make money. Concentrated wealth or capital, when used to fund means of production or distribution, not only gathers wealth to itself but shares it with all participants.
Sounds altruistic huh?
After all it's MY money, why give it to anyone else? Isn't that what the bankers on Wall street say? They keep their money, grab ours from the government and from our wallets, and then insist we give them MORE money in interest to return OUR money. Got it. Greed works.
Is there a magic word to end this? Is there a man (read politician) strong enough to end this unfair siege? Nope. We are in a spider's web. Thrash all you want and all you get is further entangled.
The only way out of the spider's web is to step carefully where the spider steps.
That's what I love about the recent spate of 'walk aways' : people who can afford to pay their mortgages but don't see the economic sense in paying for a property that no longer has recoverable value.
The banks hate this. They claim the people are dishonoring their financial obligations.
The people say, 'It's just business.'
Yeah.
There I said it. We want to believe in human kindness and the basic Godness in all of us but that's crap. Society is/was and apparently always will be a support structure for greedy self serving bastards.
Capitalism is an economic philosophy that says it takes money to make money. Concentrated wealth or capital, when used to fund means of production or distribution, not only gathers wealth to itself but shares it with all participants.
Sounds altruistic huh?
After all it's MY money, why give it to anyone else? Isn't that what the bankers on Wall street say? They keep their money, grab ours from the government and from our wallets, and then insist we give them MORE money in interest to return OUR money. Got it. Greed works.
Is there a magic word to end this? Is there a man (read politician) strong enough to end this unfair siege? Nope. We are in a spider's web. Thrash all you want and all you get is further entangled.
The only way out of the spider's web is to step carefully where the spider steps.
That's what I love about the recent spate of 'walk aways' : people who can afford to pay their mortgages but don't see the economic sense in paying for a property that no longer has recoverable value.
The banks hate this. They claim the people are dishonoring their financial obligations.
The people say, 'It's just business.'
Yeah.
Wednesday, May 12, 2010
The New World
I love facebook. It has allowed me to reconnect with people I haven't seen in forty years. Absolutely wonderful.
Except when they start posting hate propaganda like we're not real Americans if we don't sign up to keep the foreigners out of our country.
Wait a minute. Five hundred years ago some freeloaders showed up on the beach, pitched tents and started looking for gold. When they got hungry and couldn't support themselves they turned to the local government and its citizens to feed them and help them survive the winters.
Who were these bums? We call them the pilgrims and the founding fathers of our nation. We celebrate their welfare dinner every year at thanksgiving.
So yeah, the uncontrolled migration of people is hard on our society. The working poor are always a better target for the anger of the disenfranchised than the greedy bankers who are manipulating us, but shouldn't we act like Real Americans and share our bounty with the less fortunate, using the Wampanoag's generosity as our guide?
Except when they start posting hate propaganda like we're not real Americans if we don't sign up to keep the foreigners out of our country.
Wait a minute. Five hundred years ago some freeloaders showed up on the beach, pitched tents and started looking for gold. When they got hungry and couldn't support themselves they turned to the local government and its citizens to feed them and help them survive the winters.
Who were these bums? We call them the pilgrims and the founding fathers of our nation. We celebrate their welfare dinner every year at thanksgiving.
So yeah, the uncontrolled migration of people is hard on our society. The working poor are always a better target for the anger of the disenfranchised than the greedy bankers who are manipulating us, but shouldn't we act like Real Americans and share our bounty with the less fortunate, using the Wampanoag's generosity as our guide?
Friday, November 27, 2009
Economic History
What is historically good for us is not historically good for all.
Consider the Native Americans for example. The Europeans came to their country (I'm thinking this the day after our traditional feast celebrating the saviour of the early immigrants by the native population) and proceeded to teach a wealthy and successful people that they were worthless and impoverished. A lesson that the descendants of these peoples, those allowed to live, are still struggling against.
The native Americans had a successful economy based on husbandry, craft, trade, communal living and political strength derived from their ability to make war as they needed to. The Europeans brought fruits of technology that the AmerIndians had lived without and took what they couldn't trade for.
This decade's debacle in trying to Americanize Iraq is another example of why we shouldnot interfere with the economic and political lives of others.
Economics is based on the confluence of a society's morality and its material needs. History shows us that economic policy will naturally tend to support those who are best able to influence the laws governing economic activity. In general this is done to the advantage of the few over the good of the many.
The Constitution appears to be written with the fundamental idea that American economic policy should support the welfare of the people of the United States. In fact the only people well supported by the economics of the last fifty years are the amoral corporations. With no obligation other than to show growing profitability (which is ludicrous in itself) these companies have moved a majority of our production to other countries. How does this benefit the US?
The reality is that since we no longer produce, we no longer increase our personal wealth through our own labor. Wealth instead is produced by others, like the chinese workers in their sweatshops. If we own the means to import and distribute we can transfer their wealth to our own accounts, otherwise we rely on the redistribution of wealth from those who have it to ourselves.
That doesn't imply socialism but is the nature of a service based economy. Without a means of production we are servants of the ones who do have such a means.
Consider the Native Americans for example. The Europeans came to their country (I'm thinking this the day after our traditional feast celebrating the saviour of the early immigrants by the native population) and proceeded to teach a wealthy and successful people that they were worthless and impoverished. A lesson that the descendants of these peoples, those allowed to live, are still struggling against.
The native Americans had a successful economy based on husbandry, craft, trade, communal living and political strength derived from their ability to make war as they needed to. The Europeans brought fruits of technology that the AmerIndians had lived without and took what they couldn't trade for.
This decade's debacle in trying to Americanize Iraq is another example of why we shouldnot interfere with the economic and political lives of others.
Economics is based on the confluence of a society's morality and its material needs. History shows us that economic policy will naturally tend to support those who are best able to influence the laws governing economic activity. In general this is done to the advantage of the few over the good of the many.
The Constitution appears to be written with the fundamental idea that American economic policy should support the welfare of the people of the United States. In fact the only people well supported by the economics of the last fifty years are the amoral corporations. With no obligation other than to show growing profitability (which is ludicrous in itself) these companies have moved a majority of our production to other countries. How does this benefit the US?
The reality is that since we no longer produce, we no longer increase our personal wealth through our own labor. Wealth instead is produced by others, like the chinese workers in their sweatshops. If we own the means to import and distribute we can transfer their wealth to our own accounts, otherwise we rely on the redistribution of wealth from those who have it to ourselves.
That doesn't imply socialism but is the nature of a service based economy. Without a means of production we are servants of the ones who do have such a means.
Monday, October 05, 2009
Das Kapital
I had an interesting discussion with my son (the college student) and one of my daughters this evening about the value of money and the control of our economy.
For a while now I've been wondering just what has gone wrong and it is clear (as mud) that the criminals that manipulated the economy into last years collapse were just another set of jokers in the deck, deluded by the illusion of capitalist superiority.
Capitalism states that wealth comes from the investment of money. Money begets more money. Ask any banker if this simple minded truism is valid and he'll hem and haw. Ask him for a loan and he wants his pound of flesh along with every penny he lends you.
Money is supposed to represent our productivity. One unit of measure is our Gross Domestic Product. Madman Junior (my son) claimed that the US would have a negative GDP unless China (who we have an egregious trade balance with) invests in our economy. If China should think this is a bad investment and pull out of trade with us our economy would fail.
My argument to him was our economy is comprised of buying and selling the crap China exports. We aren't producing anything. There fore if China wants to continue to produce they might want to continue to give us the money to buy their production.
Or we could just say no.
This isn't a rant about protectionism. We don't need protectionist trade policies to control our economy. We need to look carefully at who is controlling our economy and where the money goes. Just like in CSI. Follow the money.
The investment community has manipulated the average relative wage and the inflation index for many years. (The inflation index shows signs of manipulation since the early 1980's). OK this is an opinion but I think I can prove it. More to follow on that front. I feel that my relative income growth has not kept up with either my value to the workforce or the GDP.
The number crunchers have taken away the sense of what money is> that is the value of work.
In 1979 my take home was 1200 a month.
today my take home is 4900 a month (roughly).
According to the economics site www.measuringworth.com the measure of my productivity (my wages) has shown a 38% growth in the last 30 years measured against the CPI (or the value of what I spend my money on).
Against the nomimal productivity of everyone else I've lost ground (Nominal GDP).
But most telling is the relative share of the GDP. There I've lost 30% of my worth. This means someone else has taken my money. And yours. This is a conspiracy theory, but not a wild one. Maybe they're just arrogant.
We shouldn't be stupid.
For a while now I've been wondering just what has gone wrong and it is clear (as mud) that the criminals that manipulated the economy into last years collapse were just another set of jokers in the deck, deluded by the illusion of capitalist superiority.
Capitalism states that wealth comes from the investment of money. Money begets more money. Ask any banker if this simple minded truism is valid and he'll hem and haw. Ask him for a loan and he wants his pound of flesh along with every penny he lends you.
Money is supposed to represent our productivity. One unit of measure is our Gross Domestic Product. Madman Junior (my son) claimed that the US would have a negative GDP unless China (who we have an egregious trade balance with) invests in our economy. If China should think this is a bad investment and pull out of trade with us our economy would fail.
My argument to him was our economy is comprised of buying and selling the crap China exports. We aren't producing anything. There fore if China wants to continue to produce they might want to continue to give us the money to buy their production.
Or we could just say no.
This isn't a rant about protectionism. We don't need protectionist trade policies to control our economy. We need to look carefully at who is controlling our economy and where the money goes. Just like in CSI. Follow the money.
The investment community has manipulated the average relative wage and the inflation index for many years. (The inflation index shows signs of manipulation since the early 1980's). OK this is an opinion but I think I can prove it. More to follow on that front. I feel that my relative income growth has not kept up with either my value to the workforce or the GDP.
The number crunchers have taken away the sense of what money is> that is the value of work.
In 1979 my take home was 1200 a month.
today my take home is 4900 a month (roughly).
According to the economics site www.measuringworth.com the measure of my productivity (my wages) has shown a 38% growth in the last 30 years measured against the CPI (or the value of what I spend my money on).
In 1979, $4,903.00 from 2008 is worth:
| $1,652.60 | using the Consumer Price Index | |
| $1,977.82 | using the GDP deflator | |
| $1,476.96 | using the value of consumer bundle | |
| $1,731.24 | using the unskilled wage | |
| $1,176.82 | using the nominal GDP per capita | |
| $869.89 | using the relative share of GDP |
Against the nomimal productivity of everyone else I've lost ground (Nominal GDP).
But most telling is the relative share of the GDP. There I've lost 30% of my worth. This means someone else has taken my money. And yours. This is a conspiracy theory, but not a wild one. Maybe they're just arrogant.
We shouldn't be stupid.
Thursday, June 04, 2009
King Obama Tututkamen
I love bigots and conservative blowhards. They are a cartoon characters when compared to an intelligent man.
President Obama's speech to the Eqyptians strikes at the heart of the middle east trouble. Consider the real history. The original Israelies were conquered by the original Italians (Romans) and driven from their homeland when they rebelled (read this as violent terrorist acts). 1900 years later the descendents of Rome in the guise of the Third Reich tries to eradicate them as a race.
In the meantime the remaining European powers have recaptured the middle east and have been parceling out it's wealth and history, while treating the people, who carried the torch of science and civilization through the barbaric times following the fall of Rome, as though they were somehow inferior, therefore causing deep seated resentment and mistrust.
So our European bretheren, after we ended their great war for them, chose not to accept any of the survivors of the Nazi's 'Final Solution' and sent them back to their original homeland, Palestine, which was now the homeland of a whole other group of people (oddly called Palestinians) who did'nt want a bunch of European immigrants taking over their cities and farms.
I can't imagine why these people should feel bad about being put aside. Didn't they realize that the Jewish people had a God given right to the land? (It's true. Read Exodus. Though I'm afraid the intervening years has destroyed the land of milk and honey).
So here we are today, a group of European immigrants who pushed aside the resident population of 'our' country, to make a great nation, in turn supporting another group of basically European immigrants of Middle Eastern extraction who pushed the resident population aside when they fought against the invasion of their land.
I guess I can appreciate our position. But it's not a noble one. We simply support those who looke at the world the same way we do.
And dear naive President Obama has pissed off the conservative hack machine by telling the world the truth. Our public self image requires us to support the oppressed and make the world a better place for children. Realizing neither side has any place else to go, the president has said let's all get along. Let the evils of the past stay there.
The idea that it's somehow unAmerican to look at both sides of an issue should make the comic book character pulpit pounders that speak for the conervatives look like cutouts of Hitler pounding on his pulpit and espousing the superiority of everything German. Or Brezshnev pounding his shoe on the podium trying to rouse the masses with emotion.
Reasonable thought and discussion should be the watchwords for political discussion. No more of this Madison Avenue hype playing to emotions with cliched images (did anyone see the new GM ad??? Right out of the Advertisers Sure Sell Handbook. Page 63. Look it up.)
God bless free speech, but keep your hand on your freedoms or the Conservative shills will scare you back into the autocratic Bush Cheney dictatorship.
President Obama's speech to the Eqyptians strikes at the heart of the middle east trouble. Consider the real history. The original Israelies were conquered by the original Italians (Romans) and driven from their homeland when they rebelled (read this as violent terrorist acts). 1900 years later the descendents of Rome in the guise of the Third Reich tries to eradicate them as a race.
In the meantime the remaining European powers have recaptured the middle east and have been parceling out it's wealth and history, while treating the people, who carried the torch of science and civilization through the barbaric times following the fall of Rome, as though they were somehow inferior, therefore causing deep seated resentment and mistrust.
So our European bretheren, after we ended their great war for them, chose not to accept any of the survivors of the Nazi's 'Final Solution' and sent them back to their original homeland, Palestine, which was now the homeland of a whole other group of people (oddly called Palestinians) who did'nt want a bunch of European immigrants taking over their cities and farms.
I can't imagine why these people should feel bad about being put aside. Didn't they realize that the Jewish people had a God given right to the land? (It's true. Read Exodus. Though I'm afraid the intervening years has destroyed the land of milk and honey).
So here we are today, a group of European immigrants who pushed aside the resident population of 'our' country, to make a great nation, in turn supporting another group of basically European immigrants of Middle Eastern extraction who pushed the resident population aside when they fought against the invasion of their land.
I guess I can appreciate our position. But it's not a noble one. We simply support those who looke at the world the same way we do.
And dear naive President Obama has pissed off the conservative hack machine by telling the world the truth. Our public self image requires us to support the oppressed and make the world a better place for children. Realizing neither side has any place else to go, the president has said let's all get along. Let the evils of the past stay there.
The idea that it's somehow unAmerican to look at both sides of an issue should make the comic book character pulpit pounders that speak for the conervatives look like cutouts of Hitler pounding on his pulpit and espousing the superiority of everything German. Or Brezshnev pounding his shoe on the podium trying to rouse the masses with emotion.
Reasonable thought and discussion should be the watchwords for political discussion. No more of this Madison Avenue hype playing to emotions with cliched images (did anyone see the new GM ad??? Right out of the Advertisers Sure Sell Handbook. Page 63. Look it up.)
God bless free speech, but keep your hand on your freedoms or the Conservative shills will scare you back into the autocratic Bush Cheney dictatorship.
Saturday, November 15, 2008
A New Day for America
Well folks, Obama is going to be president and the world thinks it's marvelous we elected a black man.
I think it's marvelous we elected an intelligent and literate man who reasons with his head instead of his duodenum. Imagine actually researching Lincoln for a philosophy on building a presidential cabinet.
I'm very glad for my brothers of color who can see someone they identify with in as president. The fact that he is a man of reason and learning is more important, and relevant, to me than his skin color.
With 'W' as our poster child, I'd rather not talk race. Let's talk about how learned people are the best hope for finding our way out of this mess. Reason, intellect and the willingness to look at more than the personal interests in the problem are the ways to solving our current Crises.
I think it's marvelous we elected an intelligent and literate man who reasons with his head instead of his duodenum. Imagine actually researching Lincoln for a philosophy on building a presidential cabinet.
I'm very glad for my brothers of color who can see someone they identify with in as president. The fact that he is a man of reason and learning is more important, and relevant, to me than his skin color.
With 'W' as our poster child, I'd rather not talk race. Let's talk about how learned people are the best hope for finding our way out of this mess. Reason, intellect and the willingness to look at more than the personal interests in the problem are the ways to solving our current Crises.
Wednesday, May 28, 2008
From the Middle of th Road
I am quite fed up with pundits and spin and the rhetoric of 'political realities'. Politics is supposed to be the science of self interest, so let's review where our self interest lies.
The current administration has provided tax breaks and lucrative contracts to well connected corporations. It has presided over a war that has increased the profits of oil companies by billion's of dollars. It weathered the worst natural disaster in US history since the San Francisco earthquake by ignoring the plight of the economically dispossessed. It has overseen record foreclosures and home losses.
Now we need to ask ourselves a few questions:
Have we benefited in any way from the Republican party's aggressive pursuit of profit?
Is the pursuit of profit at the expense of the well being of the majority of the people in the United States in our best interest?
Is the the pursuit of political ambition worth the dismantling of the greatest all volunteer Army in the world?
Sometimes I wish we could go back to the turn of the century where we were faced with a choice between the 'righteousness' of the Republican candidate as opposed to the licentious legacy of the previous administration. Given the results, if I had to make the choice over again, I'd choose fellatio over sodomy.
The current administration has provided tax breaks and lucrative contracts to well connected corporations. It has presided over a war that has increased the profits of oil companies by billion's of dollars. It weathered the worst natural disaster in US history since the San Francisco earthquake by ignoring the plight of the economically dispossessed. It has overseen record foreclosures and home losses.
Now we need to ask ourselves a few questions:
Have we benefited in any way from the Republican party's aggressive pursuit of profit?
Is the pursuit of profit at the expense of the well being of the majority of the people in the United States in our best interest?
Is the the pursuit of political ambition worth the dismantling of the greatest all volunteer Army in the world?
Sometimes I wish we could go back to the turn of the century where we were faced with a choice between the 'righteousness' of the Republican candidate as opposed to the licentious legacy of the previous administration. Given the results, if I had to make the choice over again, I'd choose fellatio over sodomy.
Monday, April 16, 2007
Reach Out and Touch someone
It's hard to know if we're a country of psychopaths or pussies. Today's horror in Virginia where a single man guns down thirty people is insane. No rational mind can see value in the taking of so many innocent lives. (As opposed to taking guilty lives? Our society is bi polar on this issue too, since we don't want to kill the guilty...)
How can one man hold thirty people at bay while he systematically shoots them? According to one eyewitness he wasn't even a good shot. (The living witness said the man shot at him five times from a distance of 30 to 35 feet and missed. Much to relief of the witness).
The only thing that holds people in that condition is fear.
Fear of what? we ask.
Of getting shot.
So they get killed. Anyway.
All right when something unexpected and awful happens people normally do the wrong thing. Without training or forethought they freeze. The brain shuts down and if they can't run away they quiver in terror as the madman rampages and kills them all systematically.
So I guess we need to think these things through. The psychos will rule the world if we let them. Being passive and waiting for rescue is usually not an option. We need to plan on how to fight back. How to keep the wacko's from treating us as playthings.
I like to think I might have charged into his fire with a desk for a shield, crushed the killer against the wall and wrestled the gun from his hand. Especially if he was reloading.
On the other hand, and in reality, I would likely have been cowering under a desk in a puddle of my own piss when he put a bullet in my head.
But I'd rather go out fighting than laying in my own fear. Hopefully this doesn't happen to me or you, but if it does? What would you do?
How can one man hold thirty people at bay while he systematically shoots them? According to one eyewitness he wasn't even a good shot. (The living witness said the man shot at him five times from a distance of 30 to 35 feet and missed. Much to relief of the witness).
The only thing that holds people in that condition is fear.
Fear of what? we ask.
Of getting shot.
So they get killed. Anyway.
All right when something unexpected and awful happens people normally do the wrong thing. Without training or forethought they freeze. The brain shuts down and if they can't run away they quiver in terror as the madman rampages and kills them all systematically.
So I guess we need to think these things through. The psychos will rule the world if we let them. Being passive and waiting for rescue is usually not an option. We need to plan on how to fight back. How to keep the wacko's from treating us as playthings.
I like to think I might have charged into his fire with a desk for a shield, crushed the killer against the wall and wrestled the gun from his hand. Especially if he was reloading.
On the other hand, and in reality, I would likely have been cowering under a desk in a puddle of my own piss when he put a bullet in my head.
But I'd rather go out fighting than laying in my own fear. Hopefully this doesn't happen to me or you, but if it does? What would you do?
Wednesday, May 03, 2006
The Manifesto Revisited
Since the basic purpose of this blog is to define a document the American people can live with let me restate the premises of the New Manifesto.
1. The government belongs to the people, not the other way around. This is our country. The bureaucrats and politicians guide it by our authority. Remember that when it comes time to vote.
2. Our leaders must not try to appear perfect. We all make mistakes. Admit them. Learn from them and move on.
3. Private ownership of the means of production is the cornerstone of our economic strength. This does NOT mean CORPORATE ownership and does not encourage outsourcing good paying jobs overseas while encouraging marginally paying jobs to be filled by illegal immigrants.
4. This is a land of immigrants. Every time cheaper labor was needed waves of immigrants came to this country, Chinese, Irish, Poles, Germans, Africans. Each group was treated badly when they came (especially the Africans) but ultimately they all became Americans. If people want to come to live in our ghettos, let them do it legally.
5. War is always a last resort, but the object of the war must be of the first agreement between ALL people in the society. Otherwise, no war.
6. Our first response to a threat is to negotiate and determine the cause of the hostility.
7. Our first response to an attack on our soil is a response in kind, but magnified a hundred fold.
8. Peaceful use of nuclear energy is a beautiful thing. But see 7 for our response to a nuclear attack.
9. Energy independence is mandatory. The sun is the source of all energy consumed, excepting nuclear. It shines on all of us.
10. The Constitution of the United States is a darn good document. It mandates the separation of powers and thus we should encourage all branches of government to be separate.
11. The Bill of Rights, as appended to the US Constitution, is a damn fine document itself. No leader has the right to abrogate any of those rights. This is what prevents us from becoming a totalitarian state.
12. Health care is not a right. However, it is a necessity. The purpose of government is to protect the individual and provide those services we can't provide individually. Health care is one of these services. Anything less is un American.
And lastly, What does it mean to be an American?
It means to be a individualist and an individual.
It means to Love your neighbor like your brother.
It means to stand tall and strong in time of threat.
It means to be creative and inventive and productive.
It means to be involved in the creation and re-creation of your government.
It means cherishing this country and its history, with all the flaws and blemishes, mistakes and arrogance. Our history is not perfect, but our ideals are.
1. The government belongs to the people, not the other way around. This is our country. The bureaucrats and politicians guide it by our authority. Remember that when it comes time to vote.
2. Our leaders must not try to appear perfect. We all make mistakes. Admit them. Learn from them and move on.
3. Private ownership of the means of production is the cornerstone of our economic strength. This does NOT mean CORPORATE ownership and does not encourage outsourcing good paying jobs overseas while encouraging marginally paying jobs to be filled by illegal immigrants.
4. This is a land of immigrants. Every time cheaper labor was needed waves of immigrants came to this country, Chinese, Irish, Poles, Germans, Africans. Each group was treated badly when they came (especially the Africans) but ultimately they all became Americans. If people want to come to live in our ghettos, let them do it legally.
5. War is always a last resort, but the object of the war must be of the first agreement between ALL people in the society. Otherwise, no war.
6. Our first response to a threat is to negotiate and determine the cause of the hostility.
7. Our first response to an attack on our soil is a response in kind, but magnified a hundred fold.
8. Peaceful use of nuclear energy is a beautiful thing. But see 7 for our response to a nuclear attack.
9. Energy independence is mandatory. The sun is the source of all energy consumed, excepting nuclear. It shines on all of us.
10. The Constitution of the United States is a darn good document. It mandates the separation of powers and thus we should encourage all branches of government to be separate.
11. The Bill of Rights, as appended to the US Constitution, is a damn fine document itself. No leader has the right to abrogate any of those rights. This is what prevents us from becoming a totalitarian state.
12. Health care is not a right. However, it is a necessity. The purpose of government is to protect the individual and provide those services we can't provide individually. Health care is one of these services. Anything less is un American.
And lastly, What does it mean to be an American?
It means to be a individualist and an individual.
It means to Love your neighbor like your brother.
It means to stand tall and strong in time of threat.
It means to be creative and inventive and productive.
It means to be involved in the creation and re-creation of your government.
It means cherishing this country and its history, with all the flaws and blemishes, mistakes and arrogance. Our history is not perfect, but our ideals are.
Tuesday, April 25, 2006
Impeach Dubyah?
Last night I saw an internet rumor that Illinois and California legislatures were voting to impeach the president. I've been checking CNN and NPR all day expecting to hear about it but I guess it's just a rumor.
I was afraid they'd really do it. Because, without a doubt, the weak kneed democrats wouldn't charge him with the real charges.
If we were to impeach Dubyah let the charges read: For incompetence, shown be his refusal to actually study the problems before he orders troops in, shown by ignoring white papers on Al_Qaeda plans to attack the US with airplanes.
Let him be impeached for refusing to admit his mistakes, and refusing to see his mistakes.
Let him be impeached for not planning to win the peace in Iraq.
Let him be impeached for making the phrase "Force is a last resort" mean war is imminent.
Let him be impeached for blowing the opportunities of 9/11.
Let him be impeached for the corporate legislation passed on his watch allowing credit card companies to gouge middle income people, big business to profit by off shoring jobs, and shifting the tax burden to the middle class.
Let's not impeach him for lying. We learned that lesson with Clinton and the Blue Dress. If we impeach a president let it be for something meaningful, like the grotesque misuse of power, as illustrated by "warrantless" telephone tapping.
Then again, if we impeached Dubyah and forced him out of office, Dick Cheney would be front and center.
Maybe we should throw out all the bums and start over.
I was afraid they'd really do it. Because, without a doubt, the weak kneed democrats wouldn't charge him with the real charges.
If we were to impeach Dubyah let the charges read: For incompetence, shown be his refusal to actually study the problems before he orders troops in, shown by ignoring white papers on Al_Qaeda plans to attack the US with airplanes.
Let him be impeached for refusing to admit his mistakes, and refusing to see his mistakes.
Let him be impeached for not planning to win the peace in Iraq.
Let him be impeached for making the phrase "Force is a last resort" mean war is imminent.
Let him be impeached for blowing the opportunities of 9/11.
Let him be impeached for the corporate legislation passed on his watch allowing credit card companies to gouge middle income people, big business to profit by off shoring jobs, and shifting the tax burden to the middle class.
Let's not impeach him for lying. We learned that lesson with Clinton and the Blue Dress. If we impeach a president let it be for something meaningful, like the grotesque misuse of power, as illustrated by "warrantless" telephone tapping.
Then again, if we impeached Dubyah and forced him out of office, Dick Cheney would be front and center.
Maybe we should throw out all the bums and start over.
Monday, April 24, 2006
Taking Responsibility
First let me say I'm back.
Life has gotten in the way of my political ranting, but I think I've been quiet too long. The other day I heard a rumor that Dubyah was planning to invade Iraq. All logic of course is against even Himself doing something so incredibly stupid, yet the rumor had some serious legs and came from a serious place.
So I thought for a while, what could generate such a rumor? Well, Dubyah did say that military force would be the last resort if the Iranians wouldn't cease their pursuit of peaceful Nuclear Power. After all Nuclear Power comes from enriched Uranium which can be used to make a Weapon of Mass Destruction. (See Chernobyl..>) I'm sure his gut is telling him that no matter what those stupid physicists say the Axis of Evil will find a way to make WMDs like they did in Iraq.
They didn't have any in Iraq?
Oh.
Well that doesn't matter. At least not to the Commander in Chief.
In fact, it doesn't matter that our military mission in Iraq was never based on winning the peace. We never had enough troops to hold the trouble spots and put out the insurgency before it started. Our troops were supposed to turn over the country to Halliburton and leave. At least that's what the general's were told.
And Dubyah said, today, that he'd do it the same way all over again.
That should be grounds for impeachment. The shear arrogance of the man to say that he's right in the face of the facts and the thousands of brave soldiers who have lost their lives and worse (what's worse than dying? Ask the young GI with no legs or the one with no hands and a new baby he can't hold or support.)
Well Congress can't impeach him because they fell for his line of shit to start with. But if he starts noising around about attacking Iran, I think the impeachment proceedings should be immediate and I think he should be forced to resign or serve his remaining term behind bars along with the rest of the brigands he brought into the administration of our nation.
As for Iran? Let them address the world energy shortage with nuclear power. God love them if they manage to not create a Chernobyl or Three Mile Island. But let them test a nuclear war head and we should offer them several of ours, with delivery systems only used once.
We might not want to take the same approach with North Korea since China would at the very least be offended by the fall out, but then again China might choose to slap the rat biting at her ankle in her own way.
Life has gotten in the way of my political ranting, but I think I've been quiet too long. The other day I heard a rumor that Dubyah was planning to invade Iraq. All logic of course is against even Himself doing something so incredibly stupid, yet the rumor had some serious legs and came from a serious place.
So I thought for a while, what could generate such a rumor? Well, Dubyah did say that military force would be the last resort if the Iranians wouldn't cease their pursuit of peaceful Nuclear Power. After all Nuclear Power comes from enriched Uranium which can be used to make a Weapon of Mass Destruction. (See Chernobyl..>) I'm sure his gut is telling him that no matter what those stupid physicists say the Axis of Evil will find a way to make WMDs like they did in Iraq.
They didn't have any in Iraq?
Oh.
Well that doesn't matter. At least not to the Commander in Chief.
In fact, it doesn't matter that our military mission in Iraq was never based on winning the peace. We never had enough troops to hold the trouble spots and put out the insurgency before it started. Our troops were supposed to turn over the country to Halliburton and leave. At least that's what the general's were told.
And Dubyah said, today, that he'd do it the same way all over again.
That should be grounds for impeachment. The shear arrogance of the man to say that he's right in the face of the facts and the thousands of brave soldiers who have lost their lives and worse (what's worse than dying? Ask the young GI with no legs or the one with no hands and a new baby he can't hold or support.)
Well Congress can't impeach him because they fell for his line of shit to start with. But if he starts noising around about attacking Iran, I think the impeachment proceedings should be immediate and I think he should be forced to resign or serve his remaining term behind bars along with the rest of the brigands he brought into the administration of our nation.
As for Iran? Let them address the world energy shortage with nuclear power. God love them if they manage to not create a Chernobyl or Three Mile Island. But let them test a nuclear war head and we should offer them several of ours, with delivery systems only used once.
We might not want to take the same approach with North Korea since China would at the very least be offended by the fall out, but then again China might choose to slap the rat biting at her ankle in her own way.
Sunday, March 12, 2006
Theory of the Revolution
Education is the cornerstone of a free society. You can not have a free democratic people if they don't understand the consequences of their freedom. History is the study of consequences. It should never be a shroud over the truth. Every despot and successful government wants to teach its people that their government is the best.
This is rarely true.
Today American education takes place in front of a fluorescing tube or liquid crystal display. Agendas and advertisement and blatant bullshit are pushed out to the populace who scan it, ignore and believe it indiscriminately. Since money buys access to the media, the major peddlers of this nonsense are corporations.
So let's take a close look at this. If corporations are corrupting the media that is the primary educational tool in this country to their own ends, and those ends always involve profit for the company, then a revolution to correct the corruption in our system and to return to the concept of a free and democratically lead populace requires gaining control over the corporations.
Can we legislate these monsters out of existence? Can we demand they have morals? Can we elect one leader who isn't bought and paid for? These are the questions, the truths that need to be addressed in the next cycle of elections.
Corporations drive our economy, something like a driver herds cattle, with a whip and a prod. If we aren't willing filling the corporate profits from our own pittance then they invent laws to take our money. Witness the latest legislation on credit card interest rates and bankruptcy. One more example of corporate greed, but I'm getting off topic.
We have to take the long view. The election and support of uncorrupted public officials is the patriotic duty of every American. Screw the parties. Democrats and Republicans are equally corrupt in their own ways. We must set the bar high and demand our elected officials exceed our expectations, instead of allowing them to slither underneath the bar.
So my brothers and sisters. Gather your pens or your keyboards, and strike a blow for the real America.
This is rarely true.
Today American education takes place in front of a fluorescing tube or liquid crystal display. Agendas and advertisement and blatant bullshit are pushed out to the populace who scan it, ignore and believe it indiscriminately. Since money buys access to the media, the major peddlers of this nonsense are corporations.
So let's take a close look at this. If corporations are corrupting the media that is the primary educational tool in this country to their own ends, and those ends always involve profit for the company, then a revolution to correct the corruption in our system and to return to the concept of a free and democratically lead populace requires gaining control over the corporations.
Can we legislate these monsters out of existence? Can we demand they have morals? Can we elect one leader who isn't bought and paid for? These are the questions, the truths that need to be addressed in the next cycle of elections.
Corporations drive our economy, something like a driver herds cattle, with a whip and a prod. If we aren't willing filling the corporate profits from our own pittance then they invent laws to take our money. Witness the latest legislation on credit card interest rates and bankruptcy. One more example of corporate greed, but I'm getting off topic.
We have to take the long view. The election and support of uncorrupted public officials is the patriotic duty of every American. Screw the parties. Democrats and Republicans are equally corrupt in their own ways. We must set the bar high and demand our elected officials exceed our expectations, instead of allowing them to slither underneath the bar.
So my brothers and sisters. Gather your pens or your keyboards, and strike a blow for the real America.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)